In recent times the Nigerian state has been rocked by

a spate of nation threatening attacks which did not

only draw blood and shatter lives but struck at the

very heart of the existence of the geo-political entity

called Nigeria, the bloody killings and terrible

kidnappings of innocent children elicited reactions

which themselves have made clear to any objective

observer that there are various strains and shades of

Boko Haram, different in form , diverse in appearance

but united in the clear objective of hate , bigotry and

lack of empathy for others.

From the criminal bandits who have relentlessly

pursued a program of wanton killings and

destructions… people who put young boys to the knife

for no other reason than the fact that they decided to

be educated … who kidnap young girls for bizarre and

non understandable reasons… whose sole goal seems

to be the unrelenting killing of innocents…. such I

refer to as Boko Haram type 1. Their case is perhaps

the most apparent, even if they are the most deadly…

To muslim-denialists who deny the fact that Boko

Haram exist … Muslims who continue to live under a

self imposed delusion that Christians are responsible

for boko haram, that the killings these bandits carry

out are nothing but orchestrations of the Christian

association of Nigeria or to some of them the

machinations of the C.I.A in the quest for the

destruction of Nigeria … as a muslim I find this

position embarrassing, illogical and pathetic. Why?

The late founder of boko haram , Muhammad Yusuf

was known in Islamic circles as far back as 2002, his

audio CDs were sold in shops publically as he spewed

his warped version of what Islam and muslims should

be …not only this , this man was confronted and

debated on these heretical thoughts by the likes of

Shaykh Jafar Mahmud Adam and Shaykh Muhammad

Awwal Albanee Zaria , who both died mysteriously

under a hail of bullets … stories abound amongst

young gullible muslims about how they were

indoctrinated and mobilized for sinister missions in

and around Maiduguri … It is on record that security

operatives battled strains of this atrocities before the

present escalation and Muhammad Yusuf himself was

arrested several times only to be released later … so

when did CAN start sponsoring boko haram? Or does

it seem reasonable that CAN would kill so many

Christians so as to give muslims a bad name? People

who think in this sorry way fail to realize that it was

our late president Umar Musa Yar’adua (may Allah be

pleased with him), himself a muslim, who issued the

instruction that the sect be put down as brutally as

possible… and it was soldiers and police men, who

had muslims amongst them, who carried out these

instruction. Why were there no screams that

Christians were involved then? What about the

numerous prisoners in the hands of the state? How

come a sizable chunk of them are not Christians?

Yes … we have had deranged or deluded individuals

who tried to reap from the conflict …like the pastor of

a town in Osun state who organized that his own

church be terrorized by members of his congregation

dressed as muslims so as to put the blame on

muslims!

However, extending his action to all Christians would

be an irresponsible generalization based on the

background information we have about boko haram.

Arguments like this abound on social media … it is

unfortunate how instead of facing our problems, some

muslims are engrossed in the pathetic peddling of

conspiracy theories!

So also do we have Christian-propagandists who,

blinded by hate and bigotry, see the boko haram

phenomenon as an opportunity to deal with the

muslims . The warped logic of such individuals can

be given in the following syllogism:

All members of Boko haram are muslims

Boko haram members are terrorists

Hence all muslims are terrorist!

Arguments of this nature , unsound and invalid ,

readily falls into the hands of wolfs in sheep clothing

who want to fan the embers of hate and bigotry by any

means possible even if with arguments any sane

person would recognize as false and illogical since

not all muslims are members of boko haram!

So also is the analogy that not all muslims are

terrorists but all terrorists are muslims!

What about Joseph Kony of Uganda? Who heads the

lord’s republican army (LRA) which is fighting for the

implementation of the biblical Ten Commandments?!

In fact veteran human rights activist and lawyer Femi

Falana, a Christian, wrote in an article (titled

President Museveni’s Hypocritical Attack On

Nigeria ) for Sahara Reporters on May 13 2014 “…It is

indisputable that the record of atrocities of LRA is by

far worse than that of the boko haram sect. It is

common knowledge that the abduction of children and

women is the hallmark of the LRA. From the account

of the Human Rights Watch between 1987 and 2006 “at

least 20, 000 Ugandan children were abducted. More

than 1.9 million people were displaced from their

homes into camps and tens of thousands of Ugandan

civilians died. Nearly the entire population of

Acholiland was displaced due to a combination of LRA

actions and the Ugandan government’s forcible

resettlement of people in camps. Living conditions in

the camps were horrific, and for years communities

were largely cut off from basic necessities. The death

toll from cholera and other diseases was often higher

than from the conflict itself”…”

Would it be sane or logical for any Muslim to assert

that all Christians are terrorists because of the

warped theology of Joseph Kony?

‘Denialist’ and propagandist are boko haram type 2.

And the most pathetic has been the reactions of

politicians to the current crisis , every action and

inaction is seen only through the lens of the upcoming

elections…some people want their tribesman still in

power , some want him out..Some people say it’s

time for APC some say the PDP must continue…and

they play fiddle, as Emperor Nero did, while the nation

burns. Even the presidency is not free of confusion if

the reactions of individuals close to the presidency is

worth anything… a certain Christian leader close to

the president believes boko haram is an Islamizing

army ( never mind the fact that Muslims have lost

their lives in droves) while a former Niger delta

militant (by the way a Muslim) also close to the

president believes it is a tribal war unleashed by

people he calls “fulanis from futa jalon” , the

presidency took more time than necessary in reacting

to the abduction of the girls since it was considered

mere political propaganda by the political opposition!

In a scathing article (titled :Boko Haram : Military is

the problem, not the solution) in ‘The Huffington Post

Uk’ of June 16, 2014, Daniel Brett lashed our nation’s

military and certain politicians of being in collusion

with Boko Haram .

It is shameful that the two most important institutions

of the Nigerian state are so effectively ridiculed and

pilloried by foreigners (like US Senator John McCain,

former US secretary of state Hilary Clinton etc). If I

were to summarize Daniel’s article I’ll simply say

‘we’ve become a banana republic!’

Let us call these individuals Boko Haram type 3!

If the war of terror waged by Boko Haram type 1 is to

be won, Boko Haram type 2 must be shamed and

silenced; Boko Haram type 3 must be sanitized,

reformed and purged!

We stand on the brink of an ethno-religious war of

gargantuan proportions and unimaginable severity,

the killing fields of Rwanda and Burundi would pale

into insignificance if these are not corrected … it is

our collective responsibility, for our future and our

children’s future…if there will be a future.



The Different Types Of Bokoharam And TheTerminal Illness Of The Nigerian State

0 comments:

Post a Comment

 
Top